| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Forum Statistics |
» Members: 4,843
» Latest member: ochoasl
» Forum threads: 1,237
» Forum posts: 9,108
Full Statistics
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 104 online users. » 1 Member(s) | 103 Guest(s) Amazinjoey
|
| Latest Threads |
audible locking
Forum: Misc
Last Post: trasgu_driver
1 hour ago
» Replies: 42
» Views: 31,670
|
360 - FM Radio frequency ...
Forum: Audio / Visual
Last Post: Capljinac
Yesterday, 10:40 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 2,365
|
Alarm installation
Forum: Retrofitting
Last Post: trasgu_driver
Yesterday, 10:29 AM
» Replies: 10
» Views: 2,193
|
Retrofit heated steering ...
Forum: Retrofitting
Last Post: trasgu_driver
Yesterday, 09:41 AM
» Replies: 55
» Views: 30,527
|
2023 XC40 Recharge Parame...
Forum: OrBit Q&A - Ask your questions here!
Last Post: moosepants
08-12-2026, 11:30 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 70
|
VCM-U105000 - Backup batt...
Forum: Service Functions
Last Post: trasgu_driver
08-12-2026, 10:22 PM
» Replies: 42
» Views: 39,226
|
XC40 Wiring Explorer mini...
Forum: Misc
Last Post: Amazinjoey
08-12-2026, 09:35 PM
» Replies: 6
» Views: 272
|
Key coding
Forum: Retrofitting
Last Post: least
08-12-2026, 11:33 AM
» Replies: 115
» Views: 121,139
|
Volvo V60 2025 after cras...
Forum: OrBit Q&A - Ask your questions here!
Last Post: jos
08-11-2026, 08:14 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 100
|
Auto-high beam change to ...
Forum: Lights
Last Post: gentryvalley
08-10-2026, 02:05 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 94
|
|
|
| ECM Reload volvo xc90 T6 2021 |
|
Posted by: konrado1 - 06-02-2026, 10:47 PM - Forum: OrBit Q&A - Ask your questions here!
- Replies (2)
|
 |
Cześć wszystkim,
Rozwiązanie nad naprawą powypadkową Volvo XC90 T6 z 2021 roku (benzyna). Silnik uruchamia się i działa prawidłowo, a moduły SRS/ASDM są wyczyszczone z danych o zderzeniu. Mam jednak problem z centralną niezgodnością konfiguracji modułu silnika (ECM), której nie można usunąć za pomocą OrBit. Podczas próby zapisu konfiguracji lub kasowania kodów błędów, moduł zasilania silnika (ECM) cały czas kody U2300. Wygląda na to, że konieczne jest postawienie diagnozy. Oto dokładne kody DTC,
które obecnie otrzymuję:
BCM: U010000 – Utrata komunikacji z modułem zasilania silnika (ECM) [Potwierdzone]
BCM: U02A400 – Utrata komunikacji z modułem kontrolnym silnika (ECM) [Potwierdzone]
ECM: P06A013 – Obwód sterowania wzmacniaczem lub zastępczym. Ogólne rozwiązanie elektryczne. Przerwa w obwodzie [Oczekujące]
ECM: U230055 – Konfiguracja centralna. Błędne oprogramowanie systemu. Nieskonfigurowane [Oczekujące]
ECM: U230056 – Konfiguracja centralna. Błędne oprogramowanie systemu.
Nieprawidłowe/niezgodne z ustawieniami [Oczekujące] Z powodu błędów U230055/56, ECM wyłączył dodatkowe funkcje, takie jak sprężarka klimatyzacyjna. Ten problem to „przeładowanie ECM” lub „zakup oprogramowania ECM” za pośrednictwem Volvo VIDA. Wolałbym jednak rozwiązać ten problem w OrBit, jeśli jest to możliwe. Czy istnieje konkretna procedura w OrBit, która wymusza flashowanie prawidłowej struktury wewnętrznej w ECM lub prawidłowe przeładowanie ECM? Czy uczestniczy w plikach SBL/VBF, aby nadpisać ten sektor EEPROM, czy VIDA jest powodem?
bardzo ważna informacja o błędzie, porady i instrukcje krok po kroku od osób, które doprowadziły do usunięcia błędów U2300 w ECM za pomoc OrBit! Z góry dziękuję za pomoc!
|
|
|
| Polestar2? |
|
Posted by: roorback - 06-02-2026, 01:10 PM - Forum: Misc
- No Replies
|
 |
Hi all,
I used to run OrBit on my S60 T8 (Sensus) and had a lot of fun with it — managed to pull off some pretty cool stuff.
I've now moved to a Polestar 2 running AAOS (Android Automotive), and I'm wondering what OrBit can actually do on this platform. There's very little info out there, but I love tinkering and I'm genuinely interested in digging in — hoping someone here has some hands-on experience to share.
The dream would be unlocking the Performance Software upgrade, though I suspect that's more wishful thinking than reality at this point.
Keen to hear what's possible. Thanks in advance!
|
|
|
| XC40 fog lights retrofit |
|
Posted by: mersadk - 06-01-2026, 03:23 PM - Forum: Retrofitting
- No Replies
|
 |
I own a XC40 Inscription MY2022 with Sensus that came without fog lights. I would like to retrofit them.
Is there an easy way to figure out if I have all the wiring without disassembling front bumper? - Connectors on the front bumper harness
- All the wires in engine harness going to CEM
|
|
|
| Polestar VCU1-U116E00 update with SP: 32406479 |
|
Posted by: Amphicar770 - 06-01-2026, 02:45 PM - Forum: Service Functions
- Replies (2)
|
 |
Hello all,
My Polestar has started displaying "Disconnect Charging Cable" while no charging cable is attached. This, in turn, immobilizes the vehicle.
Apparently, there is a TSB 36404.4 for applying OBC software SP: 32406479
Trying to avoid a trip to the Stealer. I do have, and have used, Orbit. Is this something Orbit can do? If so, where do I find / how do I get SP:32406479 ?
Thanks.
Mike
|
|
|
| XC40 Reversing Camera Retrofit |
|
Posted by: Wattsy - 05-31-2026, 07:06 PM - Forum: Retrofitting
- No Replies
|
 |
Hi all,
After buying several wrong parts and trying to find all the information in one spot and failing, here is a definitive guide with part numbers to retrofitting the factory reversing camera. This is just the rear one, not the 360 cameras.
This is for a 2022 R-Design with Sensus
Parts Needed:
-Tailgate handle (with camera hole) Pt No: 32310006
-Camera Pt No: 32286680
-Loom Pt No: 31650607
The install instructions can be found here: Parking assistance, camera, rear - XC40 2022 - Volvo Cars Accessories
The hardest part is getting cable through the boot(trunk) cable glands. After this, just run the loom, I managed to do it without taking all the trims off. Just find a way to run the loom to the centre console. Once there, I managed to put a long allen key to pull of the trim(the bit with the volume knob) its stiff, but will come. Once there, plug the loom into the correct socket.
Once all connected, go to Orbit, and activate 154. Then option 09 'Camera Gen 2 Always in Reverse''
Hope that helps!
|
|
|
| Volvo XC90 air suspension / SUM calibration issue |
|
Posted by: liushaohuai5 - 05-25-2026, 07:55 PM - Forum: OrBit Q&A - Ask your questions here!
- Replies (2)
|
 |
Hi everyone,
I’m trying to troubleshoot an air suspension calibration issue on my 2016 Volvo XC90 T8 and would appreciate some advice from people familiar with VIDA/SUM calibration.
Background:
The left rear height sensor linkage was previously disconnected from the sensor arm. Before I fully restored the mechanical position of the linkage and sensor arm, I performed a calibration in VIDA while the vehicle was physically sitting at what looked like normal ride height.
At that time, the sensor readings were roughly: - Left rear: 0.55 V
- Right rear: 3.23 V
The car was physically at normal rear ride height, but the left rear sensor was clearly near the end of its voltage range because the linkage/sensor arm was not in the correct mechanical zero position.
I have now restored the left rear linkage and sensor arm position. At the same physical normal ride height, the rear sensor readings are now approximately:- Left rear: 3.23 V
- Right rear: 3.23 V
The sensor behavior also seems mechanically reasonable now. When the rear suspension rises, I observed:- Left rear voltage decreases, for example 3.3 V → 1.9 V
- Right rear voltage increases, for example 3.3 V → 4.5 V
So I assume the rear sensors are mirror-oriented and opposite voltage direction left vs right is normal.
The problem:
Even though the car is currently sitting at normal physical rear height, when I command “normal level” / enable leveling, the rear suspension still rises. My suspicion is that the SUM still has the previous bad calibration stored, where it learned that 0.55 V on the left rear sensor = normal ride height. Now that the left rear sensor is mechanically restored to about 3.23 V at the same physical height, the SUM may interpret the car as too low and tries to raise the rear until the left rear voltage moves back toward the old incorrect reference.
My questions:
- Does this interpretation make sense? In other words, could the SUM be chasing the old left rear calibration value of ~0.55 V even though the mechanical sensor position has now been corrected?
- Is there a Orbit procedure that allows a static height / sensor position calibration where I can keep the car at the current correct physical ride height, enter the measured heights, and overwrite the old calibration?
- If the calibration routine first tries to auto-level using the old calibration, is it safe/reasonable to temporarily disable the compressor or remove the compressor fuse so the rear cannot be raised during calibration? I understand that residual reservoir pressure could still raise the car through the valve block, so I’m not sure whether this is a valid approach.
- Does VIDA require the compressor / air suspension system to be fully online for SUM calibration to complete, or can the height sensor calibration be written with leveling disabled?
- Is there any SUM adaptation reset, initialization, “identification,” software reload, or re-programming procedure that clears an incorrect height calibration? I do not mean just clearing DTCs, but actually resetting/relearning the SUM height reference.
I’m trying to avoid calibrating the car after it has already been incorrectly raised by the old calibration, because that seems like it would write another bad reference. My goal is to keep the vehicle at the current correct physical normal height and overwrite the old SUM calibration with the corrected sensor positions.
Any advice on the correct calibration sequence or safe procedure would be appreciated.
|
|
|
|